Veerappa Moily with the mandate to suggest measures to achieve a proactive, responsive, accountable, sustainable and efficient administration for the country at all levels of the government. The Commission submitted its report in 15 parts during June to May
TARC made the following observations: The Revenue Secretary is not a tax administration expert, yet he has the final say in terms of tax administration before it reaches the Finance Minister. India has one of the highest numbers of disputes between tax administration and taxpayers, with lowest proportion of recovery of tax arrears.
There is pressure on tax officers to meet externally imposed revenue targets. In addition, there is a lack of protection for tax officers from the large number of anonymous vigilance complaints. There is complete absence of research-based analysis of policy, and lack of impact assessment studies.
TARC made the following recommendations: There should be a separate vertical for delivery of taxpayer services in each Board.
The decision of the Ombudsman with regard to redressing taxpayer grievances should be binding on tax officers. Pre-filled tax returns should be provided to all individuals.
The taxpayer will have the option of accepting the tax return or modifying it. Within the next 5 years, they should move towards a unified management structure under the Central Board of Direct and Indirect Taxes.
The post of Revenue Secretary should be abolished and its functions should be assigned to the two Boards. A Governing Council to oversee the working of the two Boards, and a Tax Council to suggest policy and legislation should be set up.
There should be a focus on specialisation, including lateral entry of specialists in the Boards. The policy of not taking cognizance of anonymous complaints should be strictly followed. Dispute Resolution and Management: Retrospective legislation should be avoided.
Both Boards should start a special drive for review and liquidation of cases currently clogging the system by setting up dedicated task forces. A separate dispute management vertical should be set up in each Board.
In addition, the process of pre-dispute consultation before issuing a tax demand notice should be put into practice.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The fourth administrative reforms commission (ARC), chaired by V S Achuthanandan, has recommended to set up a state vigilance commission with .
Implementation of recommendations of seventh Central Pay Commission accepted by the Government - Flag Station Allowance.
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission had also recommended that senior positions in the government should be open to all services. The last Pay Commission’s recommendations, in , led to an increased demand in the automobile, consumer products and real estate related sectors.
2 political or technical legitimacy for a specific change. The President’s’ Committee on Administrative Management was clearly working with FDR when it formulated its proposals to reform the presidency and executive branch.
Sometimes the commission is created by. and, eventually, to the ashio-midori.com Administrative Reforms Commission favoured the Prime Minister association with the Planning Commission in the following manner. Extracts from the 12 th Report of Second Administrative Reforms Commission – Chapter 4 pages ) Recommendation a.
The Union and State Governments should make the seven step model outlined in paragraph , mandatory for all organizations having public interface.