Wilson also hoped the speech would encourage the Central powers to end the hostilities.
No Peace without Victory Peace without victory essay No Peace without Victory The author depicts times and periods when America was suffering from civil wars between and Confederates led by Jefferson Davis fought for their recognition and to be declared independent whereas the federalist who constituted the executive government of the United States led by President Abraham Lincoln stood on their ground.
They demanded for unconditional surrender of the confederates, who adamantly refused, heightening the civil war. Negotiations did not prove to be the best idea to bring peace and therefore, the only arbitration method that would bring peace in America was the sword.
This marks a remarkable history of Americans that reminds them of challenges they had to cope with before they achieved the current peace. The issues, through which these wars developed, freedom versus slavery, union versus disunion, could not allow peace to be negotiated.
It was believed that for peace to prevail then one of two events was required to occur.
This was either making sure that union is maintained, which indicated that rebellion of the south must be crushed, or a nation being conceived on slavery established successfully. The condition left no chance for compromise. The president of United States at the time, Abraham Lincoln, refused to rely on negotiation as a means of bringing peace.
The refusal was instigated by the fact that if United States negotiated treaty, it would have constituted to recognition of confederate sovereignty being a separate nation. Although formal negotiations were rebuffed, numerous efforts that were directed to achieving peace were embraced.
These efforts happened in stages which included quasi-official conversations, foreign mediations and unofficial contacts but they all failed.
Foreign countries tried to initiate mediation process but this was bluntly refused by the federalist who claimed that they would break relations with agencies and governments that will recognize confederacy.
This painted the situation as hopeless and led to loss of trust of the American president. The federalists maintained there was no existence of another administration in American land.
This made the possible chances for negotiated peace become nil. Later Lincoln offered pardon to confederates who were ready to take oath of allegiance to America agreeing to obey the states laws. This was meant to retail a policy on unconditional surrender which very few people took advantage of.
Meanwhile, exchange of fire had become order of the day heightening the civil war. This affected the northerners to a point of believing that confederacy would not be defeated and any attempt to win will result to a too heavy load for them to bear. This made many to start calling for peace negotiations again and a cease-fire.
Many people had suddenly become tired of bloodshed and were demanding for peace negotiation even if it meant confederates taking the day.
He then saw a chance where he would rally the northern opinion and demonstrate that acceptable peace will only prevail through the victory of the military. This was totally unacceptable to confederates and accused president Lincoln of shedding crocodile tears over the issue.
Conquering of the confederates The refusal by confederates led to realization of a possible failure in the coming elections.
But then, there was a turn around that oversaw change in everything. After Lincoln was reelected again back to the presidency he faced the issue head on for there to exist honorable peace.
This will only come through conquering the enemies of peace, who according to the president, were the confederates. The fight that led the unconditional surrender of confederates was responsible for the death of thousands of young men.
This was the fight that oversaw the end of civil war in the United States and peace flourishing again. The author depicts that sometimes there are no possibility of having peace without victory.
This will occur when there exists two options which prove impossible to mediate or there is occurrence of disputes which involve matters concerning principle and only two options can be reliable: Moreover, there are also some conflicts which arise from misunderstanding.
In conflicts, such as labor unions, there are possibilities of striking a compromise that would lead to establishment of peace that would satisfy both sides. Although this is true, not all conflicts come to an end following this clear understanding by the two bargaining sides.
The conflict between the confederates and federalist fell in this category. No group was ready to consider propositions from the other party.
Therefore, the solution to the civil war did not lie in mediation or negotiation but in another approach. No peace without victory is an analogy that depicts war is a good method of solving conflicts where consensus cannot be reached.
Although numerous negotiation processes were embraced to calm the civil war that arose in America inthey did not pay. The condition that had led to the war between confederates and federalists demanded for a method that would solve the issue completely and give way to peace.
American president at the time, Abraham Lincoln asked for unconditional surrender of confederates of confederates which they refused and thus winning the war was only thing that could save the country.
Thus, there is no peace without victory.Peace without Victory, ," author James M. McPherson discusses the American Civil War and the desire on both sides to achieve peace. Wars are far more easily begun than ended. The North was fighting in order to keep the Union together and to thwart further states from seceding.
Apr 02, · No Peace Without Victory Discussion in ' Civil War History - General Discussion ' started by unionblue, Mar 28, unionblue Brev.
Brig. Gen'l Member of . Primary Documents - Peace Without Victory, 22 January U.S. President Woodrow Wilson addressed the Senate on 22 January - a little more than two months before the U.S. entered the war against Germany - and appealed for a settlement of the conflict in Europe on the basis of 'peace without victory'.
Woodrow Wilson, “Peace Without Victory” (22, January ) What kind of aims does the United States have, according to Wilson? How does he justify a prominent role .
No Peace Without Victory Brownlee, Richard S. Gray Ghosts of the Confederacy: Guerrilla Warfare in the West Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, When the Civil War started many people of this nation were not expecting the chaos, destruction, and they certainly did not expect the war to last so long.
Primary Documents - Peace Without Victory, 22 January U.S. President Woodrow Wilson addressed the Senate on 22 January - a little more than two months before the U.S. entered the war against Germany - and appealed for a settlement of the conflict in Europe on the basis of 'peace without victory'.